AI

Tags 2 followers

Follow from the Fediverse

Follow #ai from Mastodon or any other Fediverse app and its public posts arrive in your timeline. No vutuv account needed.

@ai@tags.vutuv.de

Your address is used once, to send you to your own server's follow dialog. It is never stored here.

Posts with this tag

382 posts

Filters
stux⚡️ @stux mstdn.social

Has #AI imploded yet?

Otherwise we need to try a little harder! ❤️

Let’s pop some stupid bubbles! 🫧

Aljoscha Rittner (beandev) @beandev social.tchncs.de

Mal eine Frage im Bereich AI mit LLM und explizit im Zusammenhang mit a11y.

In wie weit gibt es bei blinden Menschen oder auch mit starker Sehbehinderung (übrigens auch Menschen, die nur über Sprache kommunizieren können) das Interesse (oder vielleicht auch nur die Idee) Applikationen über KI Chats mittels LLM Modelle und dem Protokoll MCP zu steuern, anstatt sich durch wilde UIs zu wühlen?

Mittels MCP (Model context protocol), werden Anwendungen über Text oder Sprache bedienbar, allerdings über den Proxy eines AI Chatbot mit passenden Modell, das MCP nutzen kann. Es kann als Alternative zu ARIA, UIA usw dienen (oder wo sich a11y in den UI-Frameworks nicht etabliert hat).

Gibt es da Meinungen und Erfahrungen zu?

Bitte boosten

Harold Jarche @harold mastodon.social

“It’s 24 hours a day, 365 days a year and it gets on people’s nerves,” Beaulieu said said. “They can’t sleep at night. They can’t sit on the patio.”

cbc.ca/news/…

NBPoli DataCentre AI
Fred Beat @fred feedbeat.me

“Es gibt einige Gründe anzunehmen, dass die Effekte einer platzenden KI-Blase langanhaltender und schmerzhafter sein werden, als beim Dot-Com Crash:
Zum Beispiel: Marktkonzentration, Tech-Nähe zu Regierungen und finanzielle Akteure, die in AI-Erfolg investiert sind.”

Quelle: structural-integrity.eu/crashing-hard-w…

1/2

ki ai bubble aibubble
Flow im Ohr @rene blog.hamdorf.org

KI kann alles besser. Teilweise. Und in wenigen Jahren zu einem großen Teil. Alles ist irgendwie starken Veränderungen unterlegen und es wird immer deutlicher und mehr. Zwar geraten die großen BigTech-Player wirtschaftlich immer mehr unter Druck, die Kosten sind immens und Geld verdienen schwierig, aber die Technologie bleibt. Sie wird also Teil unseres Lebens bleiben und in Zukunft noch […]

blog.hamdorf.org/urteilskraft

Thomas Kahle @tomkalei mathe.social

My talk submission to #40C3 was accepted.

I’ll speak in the science track about what was and is going on in #math and #ai in 2026.

An entire field and community is going through a very drastic transformation at break-neck speed. What mistakes have we made? What can we learn from software engineering which is a couple of months ahead of us? And what can we maybe teach the next field going through this?

Still a couple of weeks for interesting stuff to happen though…

Molly White @molly0xfff hachyderm.io

In South Carolina, the AI industry is making its biggest general-election bet: about $5M behind Republican Darline Graham. $2.5M came from Building the Future, a Leading the Future arm that appeared in October and hasn’t spent on any other federal race. Her opponent calls her “Data Center Darline.”

crypto cryptocurrency AI ArtificialIntelligence USpol
+5 Less USpolitics citationNeededNewsletter SouthCarolina Senate SCSen
South Carolina Senate: Darline Graham (R) vs. Annie Andrews (D)
$5.7 million • Lean Republican • From crypto and AI PACs

The South Carolina Senate race wasn’t supposed to be competitive. Trump carried the state by 18 points in 2024, and it hasn’t elected a Democrat to the Senate since 1998.10 But then Lindsey Graham died while in office in July and was replaced by his sister Darline, who was appointed by the governor and has never held elected office. Her apparent lack of qualifications, combined with party divisions and strong Democratic fundraising, has made the race surprisingly competitive, and aggregate polls have recently shown Graham leading by just 1.4 points.11
This is the artificial intelligence sector’s biggest bet on a competitive general election race. American Mission, the Republican arm of the Leading the Future PAC network, may have thought they were backing an easy winner with their first expenditure of around $375,000 to back Lindsey Graham in his primary. But since then, it has added more than $2 million to back Darline Graham in her primary runoff election and general election. In mid-October, Leading the Future brought in reinforcements: Building the Future, a new arm of the network created specifically to support pro-data center candidates, has spent $2.5 million supporting her in the general, its only federal spending so far. Crypto’s Fellowship PAC also spent $550,000 to back Lindsey Graham in the primary, but did not show up with additional funds to back his replacement.
Andrews has used the data center issue and Graham’s AI funding to tar her opponent as “Data Center Darline”. While Andrews has called for moratoriums on new data centers in the state, Graham has opposed them, saying they would give China a chance to get ahead on AI development.12

Graham has received just over $48,000 in candidate-specific contributions from crypto and AI executives, mostly from Andreessen Horowitz, the Winklevoss twins, and Microsoft. Andrews has received no crypto- or AI-associated PAC support, and no candidate-specific contributions from the associated companies I track (or their executives).
Molly White @molly0xfff hachyderm.io

Crypto has also stopped spending big for Democrats in general elections. In 2024 it put $10M apiece behind Slotkin and Gallego. This cycle, no Democrat has drawn more than about $1M, and those are safe incumbents who voted the industry’s way.

crypto cryptocurrency AI ArtificialIntelligence USpol
+2 Less USpolitics citationNeededNewsletter
In general elections, the crypto industry has stopped spending big to help Democrats. In 2024, it spent about $10 million apiece helping Democrats Elissa Slotkin and Ruben Gallego win their Senate races. This cycle, its Democratic spending has largely been confined to primaries against other Democrats. Even then, its biggest expenditure in a Democratic primary didn’t help any Democrat in particular: it was $10 million in opposition spending against Juliana Stratton in Illinois’s Senate race. Stratton won anyway, by nearly 8 points.

The crypto sector hasn’t spent more than about $1 million helping any Democrat in a general election, and those are mostly rewards to industry allies who will safely win re-election regardless. Its biggest general-election spending supporting Democrats was about $1 million apiece for three incumbents in safe or likely seats: Janelle Bynum (OR-05, Solid D), Steven Horsford (NV-04, Likely D), and Derek Tran (CA-45, Likely D), who all voted for the industry’s top priorities, the Clarity [I110] and Genius Acts [I89].
Molly White @molly0xfff hachyderm.io

But most of the money is backing winners. Crypto and AI PACs spent in 105 contests that were never in doubt, versus 44 competitive ones. The major networks didn’t back a single underdog. This is part of a strategy to buy/reward loyalty and pad the PACs’ win rate.

crypto cryptocurrency AI ArtificialIntelligence USpol
+2 Less USpolitics citationNeededNewsletter
Where the money went
$249.5 million · 171 contests†
Most dollars went to a few battlegrounds. Most contests were safe seats.
Two stacked bar charts comparing spending by tracked crypto- and AI-focused super PACs: $249.5 million across 171 contests. The dollars bar is mostly competitive races at $179.9 million (72%). Safe bets got $43.9 million (18%), likely winners $25 million (10%), and underdogs $741,000 (less than 1%). A bracket marks the Ohio Senate special election, which alone accounts for $64.2 million, or 26% of all spending. The races bar is the reverse: safe bets are 105 races (61%), competitive races 44 (26%), likely winners 20 (12%), and underdogs 2 (1%).
Safe bets are 61% of contests but 18% of dollars; competitive contests are 26% of contests but 72% of dollars.
LfDI Pressestelle @lfdi_pressestelle xn--baw-joa.social

Auf welche Frage ist KI die Antwort? Um 15:30 Uhr sprechen der Beauftragte gegen Antisemitismus und für das jüdische Leben Michael Blume @BlumeEvolution@digitalcourage.social, der Autor von „Memokratie“ Wolfgang Ullrich @lfdi@xn–baw-joa.social Tobias Keber über Social Media, KI-Slop Antisemitismus und autoritäre Bildpolitik

tube.bawü.social/w/…

#KIWoche #Datenschutz #AI #KI #Recht #DSGVO #KISlop AISlop #Bildpolitik #SocialMedia #HateSpeech #Antisemitismus

INNOQ @innoq innoq.social

🎧 AI News #14 mit Fabian Walther und Ole Wendland.

In dieser Folge:

✅ Anthropic will an die Börse, das Pflichtdokument verrät viel
✅ Eine PHP-Lücke trifft rund 70 Prozent der Webseiten
✅ Patch-Dilemma: LiteLLM liefert Schadcode, der Passwörter abgreift
✅ Kimi K3.1 Pro erreicht als Open-Weights-Modell Fable-Niveau

Überall, wo es Podcasts gibt und hier:

🔗 innoq.com/de/…
🎥 youtube.com/watch?v=Qp4yRtvwxZM

INNOQPodcast AI KI AINews AgenticEngineering

Googles Diagnose-KI: Chat happens - DocCheck

Bisher überzeugte Googles Medizin-KI AMIE vor allem in Simulationen. Nun führte sie erstmals Anamnesegespräche mit Patienten einer Hausarztpraxis. Die Ergebnisse sind vielversprechend – zeigen aber auch klare Grenzen.

doccheck.com/de/… #Digitalisierung #digitalization #DigitalHealth #ArtificialIntelligence #AI

From other networks 1

1 repost

@simsus@social.tchncs.de shared this

Already counted in the numbers above.

Keyboard shortcuts

Navigation

Home g h
Feed g f
Messages g m
Notifications g n
Your profile g p
Search /

Actions

Write a new post n
Send the post or message you are writing ⌘/Ctrl ↵
Next post in the feed j
Previous post in the feed k

General

Show this help ?
Close menus and dialogs Esc

The single-key shortcuts pause while you type, and are off on phones and tablets.